Maralyn Beck
Since the NMAG’s recent investigation into CYFD failures, the idea of removing CYFD from the governor’s authority has been gaining traction. I know in theory that “removing political influence” from CYFD sounds good—I caution you that this short-sighted, half-baked, knee-jerk response could prove problematic.
If you seek to isolate CYFD away from “political influence” because you don’t trust the cabinet secretary charged with leading the department, you are blaming the wrong person.
There are currently 6+ candidates running to be our next governor. Fixing CYFD should be their number one issue.
I agree with the Kevin S. Settlement Agreement Co-Neutrals who have said in no uncertain terms: do not do this. These national experts have knowledge and a proven history of turning around dysfunctional child welfare agencies in modern day. Listen to them.
No issue–nor state agency–exists in a vacuum. To improve outcomes for children in state custody, our governor must improve the entire child-serving system. Think chain-reaction machine. It’s all interconnected.
The vast majority of children in state custody are on Medicaid, so CYFD must constantly coordinate with our Medicaid state agency: HCA. Treatment foster care, behavioral health services, and residential hospital programs are also under HCA’s oversight. HCA and CYFD need to work as twin sisters, and to do that, they need the same parent.
HCA is just the beginning. CYFD needs to work with DOH, which currently runs CARA navigation, ECECD runs home visiting and universal childcare; law enforcement; PED for education; General Services for reimbursements to employees and foster families; and HSD and HED for increasing and supporting the workforce pipeline.
While ensuring our department follows modern, evidence-based, and data-driven best practices, it’s worth mentioning that not one other state has removed its child welfare department from its governor’s office. Not one. Nada. Zilch.
As a former foster parent, I know firsthand what an unconscionable failure this agency has been, and how impatient and desperate we are for something to change. But, as someone working in this space daily, I also know that the last thing this agency needs is more uncertainty and instability.
Solutions exist – but please, this isn’t it. There is a fragile balance here, and lives are at stake. Do not be short-sighted on this. We don’t need to separate CYFD from the Governor’s control. What we need is a Governor who takes more control by taking to heart the chain reaction and interconnectedness of all child-serving agencies.
As the Kevin S. Co-neutrals have stated, all state agencies must work together, and the most effective way to do this is to have “an engaged and committed governor, and focused and motivated agency leadership.”
This agency needs radical transparency, immediate culture change, and most importantly, experienced, committed leadership, beginning with the Governor. The era of CYFD existing in a consequence-free environment must end.
The problems facing CYFD are not insurmountable. We deserve an accountable leader who understands child welfare, will focus on addressing the toxic culture, professionalizing the workforce, respecting volunteer foster parents, and serving the children and families whose lives depend on it.
We deserve a Governor who will commit to being hands-on and focused: an “engaged and committed governor.” One who will commit to reading the AG’s report, and the LFC and Kevin S reports. One who will consult with experts and take their recommendations to heart. One who will seek to learn, not to pretend to know.
If you want to fix CYFD, elect a governor who is serious about a hands-on approach rooted in evidence-based safety-science, believes that solutions exist, and has the skills necessary to kill a toxic culture. Our children deserve better. Let’s give it to them.
Maralyn Beck is a former volunteer foster parent, and the Founder and Executive Director of New Mexico Child First Network. She is an Aspen Institute Civil Society Fellow, and a member of the AEI Child Welfare Innovation Working Group.





