Home Blog Page 101

Eddy County War is almost here

0

JT Keith

Artesia Daily Press

jtkeith@elritomedia.com

When the Artesia Bulldogs football team invades Ralph Bowyer Cavemen Stadium at 7 p.m. Friday, August 22, it will be time to renew the football rivalry with Carlsbad.

There have been 115 games played between the two schools since 1913, with Carlsbad holding the edge at 52-50-10. (No scores were found for the games in 1915 and 1916.)

The first game played between the two schools was in 1913 at Fireman’s Park on South Canal in Carlsbad.

According to Bulldogs coach Jeremy Maupin and Cavemen coach Cale Sanders, this game is essential, yet they say they are looking at it as just another game.

Both see this game as a building block toward district play and making the playoffs.

“I think there is going to be some excitement there,” Maupin said. “They spent a lot of money on the state-of-the-art facility over there. I think Cale Sanders has done an excellent job there. They have a solid group. This will be a challenging game for us.”

Sanders said that Artesia is a good football team, but his team of seniors will be ready to play.

“We are a lot better team than when I took over three years ago,” Sanders said. “We are continuing to change the culture, and we need to be ready when adversity hits. How we handle adversity will tell a lot about the game and season.”

2024

For the past two seasons, the Artesia Bulldogs have defeated the Cavemen in the Eddy County War.

In 2024, Artesia dominated Carlsbad and led 37-0 at halftime.

Carlsbad could not contain Artesia’s offensive attack as the Bulldogs exploded for 446 yards of total offense.

The ’Dogs had 88 yards on 19 rushing attempts, and in the air, the Bulldog receivers grabbed 22 receptions for 358 yards.

Carlsbad’s lone score came in the fourth quarter, and the team only surrendered a touchdown in the second half to lose 44-7.

Artesia’s quarterback, Izac Cazares, who has since graduated, completed 17 of 23 passes for 309 yards with four touchdowns.

Caveman quarterback Kason Perez completed 14 passes for 98 yards and one touchdown.

The Cavemen had only 18 yards rushing on 12 carries.

2023

In Cavemen head coach Sanders’ debut, the Bulldogs won 55-7 at Ralph Bowyer Cavemen Stadium in Carlsbad.

Artesia senior quarterback Nye Estrada completed 15 of 19 passes for 329 yards with four touchdowns for the Bulldogs in the season-opening victory.

Jesse Leroch had 11 carries for 60 yards for Artesia on the ground. In the air, Cazares caught four passes for 127 yards, and Ethan Conn had five catches for 113 yards.

Perez completed 11 passes for 127 yards and one touchdown, which came in the opening period for the Cavemen.

Four Carlsbad running backs had a combined 31 carries for 69 yards. Ian Sandoval was the leading receiver with five catches for 65 yards.

5 keys to the game

Consistency: Artesia must play consistently all four quarters, regardless of what happens.

Derrick Warren: Quarterback Derrick Warren must stay composed in his first start as the Bulldogs quarterback. But Warren has weapons in the backfield and when he throws the ball. Maupin is starting him as quarterback because he gives the Bulldogs the best chance to win.

Carlsbad a challenging opponent: Though Artesia has beaten the Cavemen during the past two seasons, they should expect a challenging game going into the fourth quarter this year.

Do not look ahead: The Bulldogs may be looking ahead to next week’s battle against Hobbs, but the focus should be on Carlsbad and this week’s game.

Offensive line: The Bulldogs’ offensive line must dominate in all aspects of the game. With one returning starter in Steven Williams, the others must blend on the fly and quickly. With the next two opponents being 6A schools, the Bulldogs need to make sure their technique and assignments are solid.

jtkeith can be reached at 575-420-0061, or on X@JTKEITH1.

Who has been busy destroying democracy?

0

Victor Davis Hanson

“Destroying democracy” — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many different ways.

How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient, and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains?

So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court?

Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster–though only when they hold a Senate majority?

Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators?

Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate “The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?”

Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president?

So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of “collusion” to sabotage Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump’s first term?

Who prompted a cabal of “51 former intelligence officials” to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a “Russian intelligence operation?”

Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign?

Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort, and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate?

Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there?

Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him?

Who coordinated four local, state, and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else?

Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor’s efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid?

Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice?

Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen?

When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign?

Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10-12 million illegal aliens?

Who created 600 “sanctuary jurisdictions” for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy?

Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists, and violent protestors over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers, and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct, and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity?

How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60-70 percent approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion?

How does a president “destroy democracy” by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes, and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents?

So what is behind these absurd charges?

Three catalysts: one, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency, and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power.

Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth, and Independents.

Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them.

So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations.

A good recipe for getting along with all types of people

0

Trip Jennings

“Thank God no one let me write newspaper columns when I was 22.”

I said this flippantly to another journalist last week as I was telling them I was writing newspaper columns for the first time in my career. It was not so much a joke as an older man looking back on his younger self with clarity.

At 22, I did not have any striking insights to offer the world.

While I could string words and sentences together well enough to make interesting paragraphs, I only had a dim understanding of the world, mostly through second-hand information: through reading newspapers, magazines, and books. Plus, my experience up to then did not lend itself to great storytelling. My life had revolved around other affluent White people living in gated communities in the Deep South, a very particular geographical, socioeconomic bubble.

I didn’t possess the imaginative power to transform a life of relative ease into a compelling drama. Nor had my understanding of the world been punctured by a diverse set of people who could challenge my deepest-held assumptions by drawing on their own lived experiences to come up with competing theories on how the world worked.

The epiphany that I had grown up in a bubble would take years to sink in, and only after I had lived around the country and married a child of Mexican immigrants whose tales of growing up were so foreign to me that her experiences genuinely shocked me. By this time, thanks to journalism, I had already met people of different races and ethnicities, from all walks of life and socio-economic situations, disparate faith traditions, including quite a few people who’d been born outside the U.S.

I am not saying the only way to become more self-aware people must live elsewhere from where they grew up, or become a journalist or have a diverse personal network, although I believe all can help. Only that these experiences have helped me understand myself better — as well as the world in which we all live, which is wondrously and frustratingly complicated.

I think about this as I ruminate on our nation’s polarized politics and the fraying it has done to the bonds that hold us together as a country. Daily, it seems the tribalism that pits Americans against each other tightens its grip on us. And I wonder if a small factor in this scenario has to do with Americans’ decreasing desire to live far from where they grew up, which, in turn, makes them more prone to be wary of people who might have grown up differently than they did, at least when it comes to politics.

Researchers in the U.S. Census Bureau and Harvard University found in 2022 that nearly six in 10 young adults live within 10 miles of where they grew up, and eight in 10 live within 100 miles. And in a marked difference from previous eras when a large portion of the American population moved regularly, new data showed that fewer than 10% of Americans moved in the annual period that ended in March 2024, the first time the figure had dropped below 10% since 1947, when the Census Bureau began tracking that figure.

I’m not saying that moving around would lance the fever of political polarization sickening our society. Or that moving is even practical for many Americans. It is expensive, and it is hard.

Honestly, I don’t know how to solve the sickness infecting our country.

But moving around and meeting new people from different circumstances and disparate worldviews, has made me more open to individuals who on first impression share nothing in common with me while making me more suspicious of people who decry that differentness is dangerous.

For that reason, I resonate much more with people who understand that in a society of 320 million people from all walks of life, belief systems and lived experiences that getting to know people in the messiness of their lives, which inevitably happens when you move around, might help us more than fighting from afar on social media or always sticking with our own kind.

Since 2005, Trip has covered politics and state government for the Albuquerque Journal, The New Mexico Independent and the Santa Fe New Mexican. In 2012, he co-founded New Mexico In Depth, a nonpartisan, nonprofit media outlet that produces investigative, data-rich stories with an eye on solutions that can be a catalyst for change.

Feds accredit air races in Roswell

0

Staff Reports

The National Championship Air Races held next month in Roswell cleared federal hurdles for this and next year’s event, via approval from the Federal Aviation Administration.

The agency, after a review of the Air Races’ application issued letters in support of the event hosting multi-class air races, including new racecourses as this year’s event will be the first held in New Mexico after it was moved from Reno, Nevada.

The approval is valid through Aug. 31, 2027 and the races for this year are planned to run from Sept. 10 to 14 in Roswell.

Six of the seven race classes were granted full FAA approval, while the Unlimited and Sports classes withdrew and were hoped to return to the races next year.

Evaluations were made during this year’s Pylon Racing Seminar, held in May, during which several participating pilots complete their course certifications needed to compete, with others expecting to do so in an additional seminar session held ahead of the event.

The Pylon Racing Seminar, known as “Rookie School” provides pilots with the training needed to compete in the low-altitude environment that defines pylon racing, read a news release from National Championship Air Races.

“This accreditation underscores the strength of our long-standing partnerships with the race classes and the FAA who are committed to producing an event that meets and exceeds the highest standards of safety and performance,” said Fred Telling, CEO and chairman of the board of the Reno Air Racing Association (RARA).

“We’re pleased to have received full FAA approval across our operations and look forward to showcasing the very best of air racing once again.”

President and Chief Operating Officer Tony Logoteta said this year’s event will also include a biplane class. The event will also feature closed-course pylon racing, STOL drag, aerobatic performances and other activities and attractions.

“Our team’s diligence and the FAA’s cooperative approach have laid the foundation to carry on our legacy of hosting a safe and exciting event – the 2025 relaunch of the National Championship Air Races in Roswell,” Logoteta said.

Unlimited class withdraws from Air Races.

The Unlimited Class opted to forgo this year’s National Championship Air Races, following a similar announcement by the Sport Class, which means there will be five out of seven classes competing in this year’s air races.

The Unlimited Class did not provide a specific reason for its withdrawal, but in an Aug. 15 news release, spokesman Steve Hinton said the decision was not made “lightly.”

“The Unlimiteds are deeply woven into the fabric of air racing, and though we’re unable to participate this year, we look forward to working with RARA toward our return to the races in 2026,” he said in a statement.

The class and the Reno Air Racing Association will work together to evaluate the unique requirements of the Unlimited Class and ensure it can compete safely during the competition in Roswell, read the release.

“While they won’t be able to join us for our inaugural year in Roswell, we look forward to working closely with the class after this event to ensure their accreditation and return at NCAR 2026,” Telling said.

The Unlimited Class generally includes stock or modified World War II fighter planes, including P-51 Mustangs, F-8F Bearcats and Hawker Sea Furies, exceeding 500 miles per hour during the competition.

The class’ decision to pull out of the races followed a July 18 announcement by the Sport Class that it would also not compete this year.

Sport Class involves modern, kit-built aircraft with speeds reaching about 350 miles per hour.

The decision for that class to pull out was linked to “operational concerns” with the new track in New Mexico, read a news release, that arose during the seminar in May.

“This was not an easy decision for our Sport Class Board, but stemmed from the complexity of our class, which races a wide speed range of aircraft on 3 different courses,” said Sport Class spokesman Bob Mills. “We feel this decision is the right one for 2025, and feel it shows our commitment, along with RARA’s, to a culture of safety and long-term success.”

Bulldog Outfitters reopens

0

Artesia Chamber of Commerce

We were very honored to do a ribbon cutting and help celebrate the official grand re-opening of Bulldog Outfitters under their new ownership. We are so happy for the Vega family and cannot wait to see what great things the future holds. Be sure to bleed extra orange this fall and stop by 1409 W. Main where they can help you get decked out for everything Bulldog. New gear dropping this week and every week.

Hours

Tues-Thurs, 10 a.m.-5 p.m.

Friday, 10 a.m.-6 p.m.

Artesia General Hospital new general surgeon

0

Staff reports

Artesia General Hospital (AGH) announced the appointment of Dr. Shyamal Pansuriya, D.O., B.Sc., B.A., as its newest General Surgeon. Dr. Pansuriya brings a broad surgical skill set, deep research experience, and a passion for patient-centered care to Artesia and the surrounding region.

Dr. Pansuriya joins AGH from Henry Ford Macomb Hospital in Clinton Township, Michigan, where he completed his general surgery residency and served as chief resident. During his training, he earned distinction for his proficiency in advanced laparoscopic techniques, robotic surgery and management of complex colorectal and gastrointestinal conditions. He is certified in fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery, fundamentals of endoscopic surgery, and is DaVinci robotic surgery equivalency-certified.

“I am excited to begin serving this vibrant and tight-knit community,” said Dr. Pansuriya. “My philosophy is rooted in respectful collaboration, thoughtful decision-making, and delivering high-quality surgical care tailored to each individual’s needs.”

Dr. Pansuriya completed his medical education at Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana. He earned dual undergraduate degrees in Honors Biology and Economics, graduating summa cum laude from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. His academic work was recognized with numerous awards, including the prestigious Ontario Genomics Research Fellowship and multiple national presentation honors.

A dedicated scholar and researcher, Dr. Pansuriya has co-authored several peer-reviewed articles on surgical innovation and rare clinical presentations, with publications in The American Surgeon. He has presented at more than 15 national and regional conferences, including the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Southeastern Surgical Congress, with topics ranging from minimally invasive colorectal procedures to rare surgical case reports.

In addition to his clinical accomplishments, Dr. Pansuriya has served as medical student coordinator, adjunct clinical faculty with Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine and held executive roles in surgical and research societies. He has mentored numerous medical students and led surgical skills training workshops for early learners.

“We are delighted to welcome Dr. Pansuriya to the AGH medical staff,” said Dr. Joe Salgado, CEO of Artesia General Hospital. “His diverse expertise and compassionate, team-based approach to surgery align perfectly with our mission to provide exceptional care for the people of Artesia and beyond.”

Dr. Pansuriya’s clinical services include:

• General abdominal surgery (hernia, gallbladder, bowel)

• Colorectal surgery (diverticulitis, fistulas, colorectal cancer)

• Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures

• Emergency surgical care and trauma

• Diagnostic endoscopy and surgical consultation

Dr. Pansuriya is fluent in English and conversational in Gujarati and Hindi, allowing him to serve a wide range of patients with cultural sensitivity and clarity.

He is now accepting new patients. To schedule an appointment or request a consultation, contact the AGH Surgery Department at (575) 736-8235 or visit www.artesiageneral.com.

Noem surveys Ruidoso damage

0

Todd Fuqua
Artesia Daily Press
tfuqua@elritomedia.com

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem was in Ruidoso Aug. 19 to view areas affected by monsoonal flooding and spoke with village officials about Ruidoso’s needs in recovery.

Following the meeting, Noem announced $11.4 million in disaster relief funding for New Mexico from the DHS, paired with $3.1 million in funding approved earlier this month for Ruidoso’s rebuilding, according to a news release.

Noem’s visit included a walking tour of Robin Road and Two Rivers Park to assess the damage from the July 8 flooding of the Rio Ruidoso. She was joined by Ruidoso Mayor Lynn Crawford; Eric Queller, Ruidoso’s emergency manager; Ali Rye, director of New Mexico’s DHS office; Adam Sanchez, Ruidoso public works director; and Victoria Baron, DHS counselor to the secretary for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Noem took no questions from the media, but met with Crawford and village and state officials for what the DHS release termed a “listening session” to further discuss Ruidoso’s situation.

Following that session, Noem’s office announced the funding commitment, and established a “lead point of contact” in Lincoln County to serve as a direct liaison to her office, according to the release.

“I would like to personally thank Secretary Noem for coming to visit the Village of Ruidoso to see what we are dealing with first-hand,” Crawford said. “She recognizes the cascading events that continue to happen and the mitigation efforts that are going to be needed for the Forest Service lands, the Village of Ruidoso, Ruidoso Downs and down into the Hondo Valley.”

Todd Fuqua is Editor for the Ruidoso News and can be reached on Instagram at @toadfox1.

Baby box planned in Artesia

0

Adrian Hedden
Carlsbad Current-Argus
achedden@currentargus.com

A space for infants to be safely surrendered by their parents could be coming to Artesia after Artesia General Hospital signed an agreement with a contractor that will be tasked with designing and installing Eddy County’s second “baby box.”

On Tuesday, Aug. 19, Artesia General Hospital announced it had signed a contract with Safe Haven Baby Boxes, a nonprofit based in Woodburn, Indiana, to design and plan for a baby box at the hospital.

The signing was the first step in the process, meaning no baby box is yet available.

Hospital staff said it was unclear exactly when it would be installed, receive state approval and be available for use, reporting the process could take “several months.”

A groundbreaking for the baby box was expected “in the near future” and another public announcement was planned when the device becomes operational.

Jeremy Kern, hospital project manager, said the installation will help fulfill the “changing needs of the community.”

“This has been a long journey to reach today, and we are thrilled to begin this crucial next step – another demonstration of Artesia General’s commitment to meeting the changing needs of our community,” he said.

A baby box is a climate-controlled container installed on the exterior of a building, usually a fire or police department, that sounds an alarm when a baby is placed inside to notify staff who immediately retrieve the child to provide care.

Under New Mexico’s 1978 Safe Haven for Infants Act, babies up to 90 days old can be surrendered in this way. Adults surrendering babies are allowed to remain anonymous and are not sought by law enforcement, unless there are signs of abuse.

The county’s first box was installed at Carlsbad Fire Department Station No. 1 at 401. S. Halagueno St. in October 2023, with approval from the city of Carlsbad and funded by a $10,000 grant from the New Mexico Department of Finance and Administration.

Other “baby boxes” are available in nearby cities Hobbs, Alamogordo and Roswell. There are currently 10 baby boxes in New Mexico, with the first installed in November 2023 at Gerald Champion Medical Center in Alamogordo.

The movement to install and use the boxes began in 2022 after then-18-year-old Alexis Avila left her infant son in a Hobbs dumpster and was convicted a year later of attempted murder and child abuse. She was sentenced to 18 years in prison.

Artesia General Hospital Chief Executive Officer Dr. Joe Salgado said the box will address the “vital issue” of infant safety in New Mexico, and prevent tragedies similar to the Avila case in Hobbs.

“I am once again proud of our hospital for leading the way in the Pecos Valley,” Salgado said. “Addressing this vital issue head-on speaks volumes about who we are and what we value.”

Local contractor Permian Construction will also aid in the design and planning of the device, which Permian owner Scott Taylor said will provide a positive impact on the community.

“I’m excited to collaborate with Artesia General on another community-centered initiative, he said. “This project underscores our shared commitment to safety, compassion, and positive impact.”

Managing Editor Adrian Hedden can be reached at 575-628-5516, or @AdrianHedden on the social media platform X.

Democrats are on the wrong side of medical malpractice reform

0

Sherry Robinson
All She Wrote

The State Ethics Commission tore the mask off New Mexico Safety Over Profit and revealed – ta da! – trial lawyers.

After arguing that they didn’t have to register as lobbyists or reveal funding sources, NMSOP had a change of heart after reading the commission’s 73-page lawsuit. They settled by paying a $5,000 fine (the maximum allowed), registering with the state, and releasing their full list of donors, along with expenditures.

We learn that in recent years about 50 trial lawyers and/or their firms dug into deep pockets and found nearly $1.3 million to fight reforms of the state’s medical malpractice law and related measures. Three-quarters of donors are board members or past presidents of the Trial Lawyers Association. Many have waged the big-dollar lawsuits against healthcare providers that appear in the news. Four were outside the state, including showboat Iowa lawyer Nicholas Rowley, who ponied up $425,000. The Trial Lawyers Association was good for $245,000.

So much for the charade that NMSOP was just a group of regular folks. Now they want us to know who they are. In a recent newspaper ad, NMSOP said in red boldface: “We don’t hide our donors. We celebrate them.”

This is the group that crushed reform of the state’s medical malpractice law in the last legislative session. This law, delivered in 2021 by a former Trial Lawyers Association president and a compliant Legislature, has painted a target on the state’s doctors and caused malpractice insurance premiums and litigation to spike. New Mexico is the only state losing doctors.

This year, to fight medical malpractice reforms advanced by the nonprofit Think New Mexico, NMSOP advertised in newspapers and social media and attacked Think New Mexico in op eds. The Trial Lawyers Association in 2024 showered Democrats with $556,354 in campaign contributions.

According to followthemoney.org, the Trial Lawyers Association gave $15,200 to Sen. Peter Wirth, $20,700 to Sen. Linda Lopez, $10,700 to Sen. Joe Cervantes, $10,000 to Sen. Katy Duhigg, and $8,000 to Sen. Cindy Nava.

Here’s what they got.

The two key bills were SB 176, which protected injured patients but capped attorney payouts, and HB 243, which allowed New Mexico to join the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, an agreement among states to recognize each others’ professional licenses. It’s the easiest way to increase doctors, said sponsors. Companion bills would have done the same for other healthcare professions.

Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, a lawyer, assigned SB 176 to three committees to slow it down. He defended the 2021 measure to the Albuquerque Journal and repeated NMSOP talking points about harming patients and holding insurance companies responsible.

Sen. Linda Lopez held SB 176 in her Health and Public Affairs Committee for 40 days of the session’s 60 days. Her biggest campaign donor in 2024 was the Trial Lawyers Association; with contributions from individual lawyers and law firms the amount doubles.

SB 176 died there on a 5-4 vote, with Democrats voting against. Donations to the five cost the trial lawyers less than $300,000.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Joe Cervantes sat on the compact bill, HB 243, more than a week after it passed the House unanimously. In committee he disparaged the medical compacts as a “creative way to make a buck.” He and Sen. Katy Duhigg made dozens of amendments until the bill was unacceptable to the interstate compact commission. The other compact bills also died. Trial lawyers don’t like the compacts because they wouldn’t be able to sue the interstate compact commissions that oversee the compacts. Why would they sue the commissions? Who knows?

Cervantes and Duhigg are both lawyers. Their law firms sue doctors. Does anybody think they might have a conflict of interest?

Now look at Rep. Mariana Anaya, who is holding a town hall on medical malpractice reform and doctor shortages. NMSOP’s newly released expenditures show that it paid Anaya’s consulting company $10,000 last October, after she had won her Democratic primary. With no opposition, she was effectively an incoming legislator. This is on top of the trial lawyers’ campaign donation of $6,000.

NMSOP has tossed us enough red herrings to start a seafood café: Greedy corporate-owned hospitals, greedy insurance companies, imagined limits on patients’ right to sue, and hospital horror stories.

Yes, providers make mistakes. Yes, some should find another profession. We feel for the victims and want to assure their care, but who is served by a $40 million verdict that either bankrupts the organization or cripples its ability to serve?

Our healthcare shortage is becoming a major issue. New Mexico Democrats are on the wrong side of this debate.

Sherry Robinson is a longtime New Mexico reporter and editor. She has worked in Grants, Gallup, the Albuquerque Journal, New Mexico Business Weekly and Albuquerque Tribune. She is the author of four books. Her columns won first place in 2024 from New Mexico Press Women.

Is Holtec pulling out of New Mexico?

0

Adrian Hedden
Artesia Daily Press

Grave concerns for the viability of a project to store nuclear fuel at a site near Carlsbad were shared by the company proposing to do so in a letter to local officials in southeast New Mexico.

Company officials wrote in the letter that the project “was impossible” amid strong opposition from state lawmakers and current agreements in place with local leaders, though suggesting later that such issues could be renegotiated to move the facility forward.

Holtec International appeared ready to build the facility which would hold up to 100,000 metric tons of the refuse after a June U.S. Supreme Court verdict reinstated a federal license to build and operate the site.

But in a July 28 letter to the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, which was presented to the group at its Aug. 11 meeting, the company said the project was blocked by New Mexico state law.

That’s because of Senate Bill 53, passed by state lawmakers in 2023 to bar any state agency from issuing permits Holtec would need to operate the site, and the overall “political climate” in New Mexico, read the letter.

Holtec was issued a federal license to build and operate the site known as a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF) by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in May 2023, an approval that was vacated by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last year.

The matter, along with a similar license and ruling to vacate the license for a site to store the fuel in Andrews, Texas, by Interim Storage Partners, went before the U.S. Supreme Court this year with justices ruling those opposed and who initially appealed the license to the site had no legal standing to enter the licensing process in the first place.

That left Holtec and its supporters claiming victory and expecting the project to move forward, after more than a decade of negotiations between the company and Alliance, public hearings and debate.

But the progress could be stalled, as Holtec’s recent letter to the Alliance sought to terminate its revenue sharing agreement with the consortium. The agreement would give ELEA a third of the project’s revenue once the facility was operational in exchange for use of the land needed.

“Unfortunately, the passage of state legislation that effectively prohibits the construction of the CISF, combined with the continued public opposition expressed by New Mexico’s current administration, has made the project impossible in the near future,” read the letter signed by William F. Gill, Holtec vice president and senior counsel.

Gill went on to explain that the project’s success hinged on support expressed by former Gov. Susanna Martinez, a Republican – support that was reversed by Martinez’ successor and current Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham.

Lujan Grisham, her Cabinet, lawmakers and New Mexico’s entire five-person congressional delegation – all Democrats – remained opposed to the proposal and the project in Texas throughout the licensing process due to risks they purported it could pose to the oil and gas and agriculture industries in rural southeast New Mexico.

“Faced with the obdurate opposition of the state government to establishing the consolidated interim storage facility in the state, we find ourselves with no alternative but to respectfully terminate the revenue sharing agreement effective immediately,” the letter read.

Waste project still viable?

Despite those words, Holtec spokesman Patrick O’Brien said in a statement the company still believed the project was doable, pending further negotiations with the Alliance to potentially alter the agreements and allay concerns expressed in the letter.

“With the NRC license in place, our HI-STORE consolidated storage project in New Mexico, partnered with Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, remains a viable part of that solution,” read the statement emailed to the Current-Argus on Aug. 14. “The two parties, with a nearly decade long relationship, have discussed options available moving forward on both the revenue sharing and land purchase aspects under the current agreement, and will continue to do so.”

Alliance Chair John Heaton agreed it’s not over.

He said the Alliance and Holtec continued to negotiate how to get around the state legislation effectively blocking the project, and that Holtec cannot “unilaterally” terminate the agreement.

“The letter they sent us has no basis in fact as far as what they (Holtec) plan to do,” Heaton said. “This says they want to withdraw from the agreement, and there is no provision in that agreement that they can do that unilaterally.”

Aside from those plans, and concerns over opposition in New Mexico, Holtec also explained in the letter that it planned to take part in the U.S. Department of Energy’s “expressions of interest” program which would see the company going out to other communities to find support for other federal waste storage facilities.

Holtec’s agreement with the Alliance, Heaton said, is “essentially a non-compete” agreement, meaning the company is not allowed to promote or take part in competitive projects in conjoining states.

Heaton said that means Holtec cannot pursue projects in Colorado or Texas, places the federal government, he said, was targeting for such facilities. The company and local leaders remained in discussion on how to address these contractual concerns, Heaton said.

“I think we can get to some agreement,” he said.

Critic says project doesn’t ‘make any sense’

However, Don Hancock with the Southwest Research and Information Center in Albuquerque, a frequent critic of nuclear development in New Mexico, said Holtec’s letter was “unsurprising” as he said the project was doomed from the start.

He also said it is not economically sound as he argued Holtec does not have any customers – utility companies in possession of the spent fuel that are currently storing it onsite at the reactors.

About “90%” of spent nuclear fuel is already stored in the eastern half of the U.S., Hancock argued, and efforts to move it out west were “bad and nonviable.”

“It is confirming what has been suspected for a while,” Hancock said. “NRC licensing is necessary, but not sufficient. They have no customers. Who’s going to be pay for the transportation?”

As for the Supreme Court ruling that supported Holtec and the Texas facility, Hancock said the idea that it made the projects inevitable was “not realistic.”

He questioned if leaders in Carlsbad and the surrounding communities would ever receive a return on their investment in the project, which entailed granting Holtec access to the 1,000 acres of land for the site, along with promoting and supporting the project over the years.

“You can’t do it in New Mexico,” he said. “The thing I hope the local people in Carlsbad would say is that they invested the money to buy this site. What are local people actually getting out of it? That’s too bad that they pursued projects that don’t make any sense.”

Managing Editor Adrian Hedden can be reached at 575-628-5516, or @AdrianHedden on the social media platform X.